webex connect shoots for widgets September 15th, 2007  

web-strategist, Jeremiah Owyang’s excellent blog, carries an interesting video interview with Shankur Iyer, who is VP of Strategic Initiatives at WebEx. WebEx, a recent acquisition by Cisco, provides enterprise netmeeting, conferencing and collaboration environments. The video is of interest if only because it points the way forward to what the web may become: a shared platform where functionality consists of numerous, widgetized tools. It’s my conviction that widgetized voice tools, such as we’re developing for environments like Facebook will have their role in the enterprise too.

By: admin

where are the compelling VOIP applications? September 14th, 2007  

Over at Skypejournal, Jim Courtney is reflecting on the scarcity of compelling VOIP applications and, indeed, mash-ups. Of course, his perspective is that of the rich mash up culture that exists around Skype Extras, but I have a hard time calling these “VOIP applications”. It’s clear, that the release of the Facebook API has caused a monumental shift, for us, at Rebtel too: we released our first Facebook Application in August and are now planning the release of a further release before October. For us, the question is, and always has been: how can we add value to our users’ experience of using VOIP? Our approach has always been to use VOIP technology in an invisible and transparent manner. Early on we decided that making calls tethered to computers or headsets was not a route we were going to take. The beauty of Rebtel is its simplicity: you use your mobile phone as you have always done, use your address book as you have always done. Simple and elegant. To us, enhancements are refinements of that basic proposition, not adding bells and whistles to what is a bloated product to begin with. It’s all very well that I can open a mobile browser page to initiate VOIP calls, but what if I don’t have 3G coverage? I have tried iSkoot and Jajah’s mobile offerings, but they fail where reliability of service is concerned, because none of those applications enable you to use your phone for what it was intended.

I think it is Jeff Pulver who raised the stakes by offering a reward for “cool” VOIP apps. It’s true, there is a quest for coolness here, coolness meaning anything that is not “Call Forwarding and/or Voicemail” in Jeff’s words. So, what would be compelling then?. Jeff writes:

(…) after listening to Brian Whitton speak, it became clear to me there is still a great opportunity to disrupt the communications industry, if for no other reason, than because of the amount of business processes in place at Verizon (and other incumbent Telcos) before a new service is deployed. In fact, in the time it takes for the financial analysts at Verizon work out the operating budgets for doing a voice over ATM rollout and the time engineering spends trying to justify the “risks” for deploying an IP Voice solution, the seed of a communications revolution could planted and sown. All it takes are like minded people who want to change the way we communicate and the guts to take on the status-quo. And what is better than the present time to reboot and restart the Internet Communications revolution?

Well, yes. However, rebooting in this business to us means giving people the easiest means to accessing VOIP from their ordinary phones. After all VOIP is but a technology for transferring Voice over IP: it’s not a service in and of itself. I would guess that more than 90% of mobile calls are initiated from our phones’ address books. Increasingly, people have free local minutes included in their calling plans. We figured it would be cool to turn those minutes into local calls, especially if you want to call internationally.

Sometimes I think “compelling” services are only compelling for those already in the know, the inner circle of VOIP watchers, so to speak. Twitter and Facebook are often mentioned, and Jeff mentions them too. If there’s one thing we’ve learned it’s that those services are so successful because they remove clutter and simplify things, while offering a wealth of access options to their basic service offering. It’s true, there’s a wealth of opportunity in VOIP, but it is through simplicity that the revolution will happen. Rebtel: simple stuff: use your address book to call your international contacts for next to nothing, or even free if you make smart calls. That’s cool enough for us.

By: admin

Apple iPod touch would make a killer Voip phone… September 7th, 2007  

ipodtouch

…if it had a microphone, that is.

Last month the iPhone dominated the news, but now that the ipodtouch is hitting the stores later this month, Apple’s two-pronged strategy is becoming clear. In a surprising move that will have put frowns on the faces of AT&T’s board of directors, Apple is making the new touch available including wifi capabilities, and with the possibility to download songs directly from iTunes onto the iPod. AT&T will be none too pleased about this: a shrewd bit of strategic maneuvering had Apple out-witting them. On CNN Money, Stephanie Mehta points out:

The Wi-Fi capabilities built into the touch – and other devices such as Nokia’s N95, Samsung’s T409 and a number of Windows mobile devices  - in the long run could end up by-passing wireless phone networks altogether. How? If a user downloads ringtones or searches the web on a Wi-Fi network, he or she is not consuming minutes on the carriers’ data networks, which phone companies are spending billions to build.

Elsewhere I’ve been saying that a wider availability of Wifi enabled devices coupled with VOIP services will be a substantial kick in the behind of Mobile Operators. It’s easy to see why AT&T disabled VOIP on the iPhone, and now Apple has gone the other route and has released a device that is – at this moment – a phone without a microphone. All this to the relief of AT&T directors, no doubt. However, it’s also abundantly clear, that the iPod with a microphone, or a device like it, will come. When the iPhone was first released, there were a lot of comments on the stranglehold AT&T was supposed to have on Apple. It’s now obvious that this is the other way round. And it is like this for all of us. I’m cited in the article as bragging of “using (my) hotel’s Wi-Fi connection to make a 90-minute VOIP call to Europe” where roaming charges would have bought me a new phone altogether. Today that’s as true as it was then. Apple has now changed the landscape. Device manufacturers but also the likes of Nokia have tried to push wifi and therefore voip for a couple of years now. For consumers wishing to make cheap international calls, Voip is a success story that is as yet poised for success. Its breakthrough may be one step closer but we are still missing an open platform strategy from the device manufacturers. Meanwhile, manufacturers are reproaching Telcos for not opening up their platforms to enable innovation as seen on the tethered Internet. Neither Apple nor Nokia have ever been known for such an open approach. Compared to them, even Microsoft looks decidedly open source.

By: alexander drewniak

links September 1st, 2007  

###linkharvest###

By: admin